Voter’s Edge California
Get the facts before you vote.
Voter’s Edge California
Go to top
Brought to you by
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
November 8, 2016 — California General Election
Ballot and voting information for the state of California.
This is an archive of a past election.

District 5California State AssemblyNovember 8, 2016California General Election

November 8, 2016California General Election

California State AssemblyDistrict 5

Share This Page

Election Results

  • 100% of precincts reporting (444/444).

About this office

State assembly members introduce and vote on new laws, hold hearings, and draft the state budget. They are elected to two-year terms.
Access additional information about this contest in the tabs in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.

Who’s Running?

For this office, only the two candidates who get the most votes in the primary election appear in the general election. This is because of California's "top two" system. In some cases, the two candidates may be from the same political party.
Candidates are sorted in order of election results.
Photo of  Frank Bigelow
No information provided.
Encourage candidate to share their information on Voter’s Edge.
Are you this candidate? Add more info.

Frank Bigelow

Republican
Rancher/Businessman/Assemblyman
121,644 votes (64.5%)Winning
Use tab to activate the candidate button. Use "return" to select this candidate. You can access your list by navigating to 'My List'.
For more in-depth information on this candidate, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.
Candidate has not provided information.
Encourage candidate to share their information on Voter’s Edge.
Are you this candidate? Add more info.
Total money raised: $974,968

Below are the top contributors that gave money to support the candidate(s).

1
Mid Valley Disposal
$17,169
2
California State Council of Laborers
$17,000
3
California Association of Realtors
$12,500
4
AT&T
$11,075
5
Ponderosa Telephone Company
$10,400

By State:

California 90.89%
Florida 1.07%
Illinois 1.03%
North Carolina 0.89%
Texas 0.89%
Other 5.23%
90.89%

By Size:

Large contributions (99.98%)
Small contributions (0.02%)
99.98%

By Type:

From organizations (85.49%)
From individuals (14.51%)
85.49%14.51%
Source: MapLight analysis of data from the California Secretary of State.
Email frank@frankbigelow.com
Democratic
Retired credit manager, fine artist
66,949 votes (35.5%)
Use tab to activate the candidate button. Use "return" to select this candidate. You can access your list by navigating to 'My List'.
For more in-depth information on this candidate, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.
Candidate has provided information.
Thank candidate for sharing their information on Voter’s Edge.
  • Require living wages for full time work, and require future wages to grow with the economy
  • Establish a California single payer healthcare system, that covers all our citizens with better results at half the cost-- like those in other industrial nations.
  • Global warming is happening, humans are the cause, and humanity is at risk. We must confront global warming or it will confront us. In CA, it means progressively less water.
Profession:Retired credit manager, fine artist
Corporate Credit Manager, Natomas Company (19741979)
University of California, Berkeley Bachelors degree, English (1972)
member of organizing committee for BSEP, site and district representive, Berkeley School Education Program (19861992)
1.
Drought

Climate changes and the continuing drought worry many in California. What new strategies do you believe would ensure that California is able to both satisfy its water needs and protect the environment? Please be specific. 

Answer from Robert Carabas:

The issue is not climate change; the issue is global warming.  Climate change is just one symptom of the larger question of global warming.  Further, it must be understood that global warming is happening, it is caused by humans and it is a threat to humanity.  All earth science institutions in the world support these facts; none deny human causes nor the threat.

California will have progressively less water, longer droughts, and higher temperatures.  The approach to water in the past has been to build more dams and reservoirs--surface storage.  Unfortunately with historic temperatures loss of water to evaporation has been about 5 feet a year on surface storage.  The character of the climate in the state will change with longer droughts, higher temperatures, and occasional catastrophic storms rather than our normal rainy seasons.

This means we must stop building surface storage for water and instead study our valley aquifers for geologic character, quality and quantity of water.  We must build a distribution system to capture flood water from occasional large storms and move that water to the aquifer for passive, planned/constructed sumps or pumping stations to bank the water in the aquifers.  Also, the state should work with farmers and universities to improve individual conservation of water.  80% of the water that is currently being used in the state is for agriculture; so we must assure the quantity and quality of the required water, but at the same time recognize that we must avoid over-pumping in the valley and over-planting of new land without budgeted water sources.

We must recognize that population will outrun our ability to confront the problems we have created with global warming.  This problem will become even more extreme, of course, if we do not confront global warming on the national and international level.  It is very important that the public becomes aware and demands action.  In my district this is particularly important because we are the watershed for most of the state.

The state needs to recognize that we must rethink and address the needs of our watershed.  Water can no longer be harvested without significant investment in the health of our watershed.  Traditional clearcutting must be outlawed and workers put in the forests on an on-going basis to keep the understory thinned to optimal levels. 

2.
Fiscal Priorities

What are your top three fiscal priorities, recognizing the need to balance the state’s income with its spending?

Answer from Robert Carabas:

Instead of being so concerned with spending by the state we must become more concerned about the unfair taxing of our citizens by the economy.  Over the last 35 years the wages of the middle class and the lowest paid workers have been flat.  The state-passed $15 minimum wage must be implemented as quickly as possible to a living wage; then we must grow those wages with the pace of the economy.  In this way, rather than encouraging more state spending, citizens will be able to invest in life decisions that are personally relevant.

A California single payer healthcare system has the same potential to put money back in the pockets of our citizens.  Other industrial nations provide all their citizens healthcare, with better results at half the cost. That should be our goal in California.  For a family of four this means $8,000 a year put back in their family budgets for buying a home or educating their children.  Between wages and reasonable healthcare the middle class will begin to grow again.

As I described in question one, planning for water and confronting global warming is must.

 

3.
Minimum Wage

There are a variety of proposals to raise California's minimum wage. Many of these proposals face opposition from business groups who are concerned that they would kill jobs. Do you support increasing the minimum wage in California?  In your answer please explain your position on the relationship between wages and jobs with specific reference to the situation in your district. 

Answer from Robert Carabas:

During the last 35 years, minimum wage workers have not received a raise largely because, with the help of government, business has destroyed the labor movement that assured wages grew with the economy. The business community in my region cannot understand why small businesses struggle so hard to survive.  When 20--30% of the working people in our region earn sub-poverty wages how can those working people patronize the small business community or participate in the community as a whole?  We have killed the golden goose--the consumer.

I would ask the businessman, say a rancher, if for the last 35 years you had not been able to raise the cost of a pound of beef, how many ranchers would there be in California?  It's time to recognize that jobs aren't killed by higher wages, they are killed by lower demand from lower paid workers.  If your customers are only from the top 10% of the economy then it might not matter that the other 90% can't do business with you; but if you are selling to the general public you might want as much money as possible in the hands of your fellow citizens to spend in your business.  Go to the US Department of Labor web site where the myth that higher wages kill jobs is discredited by numerous independent studies.   

 

4.
Money in Politics

Many Californians are concerned about the influence of money in politics. What can the state legislature do to ensure that decision-making by elected officials is not swayed by moneyed interests at the expense of constituents?

Answer from Robert Carabas:

We must act as a state to limit campaign contributions.  I personally accept no more than $200 from any one source in my campaign so that I might speak openly about what I believe and will work toward.  I will be happy to work for the interest of business if it serves the interests of the people I represent first and foremost.  I don't think it is a matter of money buying influence as it is that money buys the entire agenda.

     

Email me@robertcarabas.com

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.

PUBLISHING:PRODUCTION SERVER:PRODUCTION